@CharleneMaeF 

While your statement may actually be correct, the businesses that use QB to process online payments don't technically take payment, QB does. Then those funds received are paid out after a fee has been charged for 'payment processing'. Therefore the part of the prcoess which has to be PCI compliant is totally owned by QB.

Also, if this was really about 'customer' data security, why is no one bothered with checks which display customer bank account details? Credit card companies are liable for fraud - this is about proctecting them, not us or the customer.

At the end of the day, sure if we don't like it we can go elsewhere (and will). However, that type of corporate culture will impact a business the size of QB. If you multiply the number of clients that all those who have commented on this thread have, it will be in the 000s, and any disatifcation will spread - this will cost QB. If you then extrapolate the number of commentors vs the number of people who will just read the comments (usually on social media that is just 2% who comment and interact), this thread will have an even greater impact.

As many said, we are free to leave, and some of us will.